Saturday, June 18, 2011

Taking Questions from our Readers

What is “psychic warfare” and how does it fig in to your scheme?

Is there sin in “Heaven” or what you call Hyperspace?

Does the Federation really control the outcome of football games?

Do people in the Federation and such know the future?

What is “terrestrial” existence?

How does that “funnel” illustration in your Prophecy book fit in?

What is the “psychic chessboard” and how does that fit in?

Do you believe there is a thing called “Sin”?

If so what are the deleterious effects of it on our lives?

Whatever happened with that “San Bernardino” incarnation (life)?

If hyperspace has no actual "space" and no actual location, how can hyperspace be said to have "dimensions?

Can the future be known - by Anybody?

You know something? You ask good questions. It shows you’re thinking. You’re not just slipping into a mental fog and believing everything (or not) what you are reading. I’ll attack all these questions in sequence right now. First of all there is psychic warfare but it doesn’t “take place” in hyperspace. It takes place in our three dimensions in various places such as the Federation or the Beta Centaurians or Alcyonne. But what it does is USE the lowest or first psychic dimension to play upon people’s minds. Keep in mind people elsewhere are really smart. The Federation doesn’t have dummies. They’re the sort of people if they joined the Boy Scouts would have achieved Eagle Scout by the time they’re twelve. That kind of smart. People get a lot dumber hanging around this dumb society, and we’re getting dumber all the time, I suspect. In other words you have to be “physically there” in the third dimension. In a “vision” they are in your “event horizon”. In terriestrial (spirit, ghost) occupation, you are in Their “event horizon”. (Capish?) This answers the second question. There is no sin once you have actually advanced into the hyperspace world. Yes the Federation controls football game outcomes and NO they do NOT know the outcomes ahead of time. If I have implied they did it’s my error. But they are very smart and see things akin to sports commentators on steroids. You know how a TV commentator often says “Here’s what strategy the team needs to use” and the team does something really stupid instead and they lose the game. It’s kind of the difference between being a Jeopardy contestant for real, and getting butterflies, and sitting comfortably on your couch on TV. They use Star Wars (Jedi) style mind manipulation to either make a player miss a pass or go to the wrong place, or else give him tips on how to be cool and catch a difficult pass. “Warfare” comes because competing entities are trying to control the game.

This “terrestrial” question has flummoxed me in the past. It's one thing for instance to have some "hunch" or emotion you can't explain. To have the feeling "someone is watching me" is a more specific complaint. Before you scitzophrenic chassers come after me, what about a hidden camera in a dressing room? It "sees" you. The camera doesn't see itself but it views everything in its "event horizon" on a two dimensional basis. You are in its "territory". As best I know the “region” of areas such as Cortessians, for instance, have “portals” in the second psychic dimension shaped in the pattern of ground or terrestrial occupation. They thus “occupy the space” psychically. “But you said you weren' t really there in the 2nd. dimension”. Well, it’s kind of like their souls or "psychic energy" can be physically there but- - their body isn’t. I guess that's what "astral projection" is. It's just that. It's a projection. It wouldn’t be that different to say that I was on Reigel V for instance. But I’m not staking out land and don’t take up permanent residence. If a bunch of us from where I live did it all together, we might be said to be "terriestrial". That was a hard question.

Let’s do the karmic funnel one. You know the whole Griffith Park observatory demonstration with the orbits of the planets and all and being “caught up in your orbit of sin”. Sin has its own restricting momentum. A Scientologist would say if you ever go down the bottom of the funnel you have achieved psychic death. In terms of the thing one must, as in the case of the “soap bubble” analogy make mental leaps. This funnel exists not in physical dimensions at all but "karmic dimensions". Hyperspace is still a "physical dimension". It's not a material dimension but it has a theoretical physicality. Karmic dimensions are a "measurement" of another sort. But still useful. The Vertical nature of the funnel represents karma. The Horizontal dimension represents Freedom, which is also a karmic, rather than physical dimension. The funnel exists in these karmic, non physical dimensions. The psychic chessboard goes back to “Psychic Wars” and basically is carried out by “who is fer ya and who is again you”. But it also alludes to the karmic dimension of Freedom, too, so it has a double application. I have stated that one normally wants a big rather than a small chessboard. This is because you never enter in at the beginning of the “chess game” but find that a lot of pieces have already been arranged for you before you got there. Hence the expression “He was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple”. More often than not a small chessboard works to your detriment because it gives you fewer options to get out of the jams the “set up” placed you in. It is a matter of “trying to control as many squares on the board as you can, so in this it is like the Federation verses whoever. If you’re able to enlist aid on your behalf you will prosper more than if you have “tellestial” enemies against you. (“Tellestial” refers to the one dimensional portal to “whoever is pulling the strings”. In answer to the next question I don’t refer to Sin in the Calvinist sense but rather in the sense of “error” that the scientologists use. To call it “sin” it actually has to be Wrong. Many Christians live submissive, responsible lives, yet some religious church cult still imputes “Sin” to them. A “Vice” in and of itself is not a sin. Neither drinking nor gambling nor prostitution is “en se” a sin. Under our definition. But true “error” will shrink your chessboard and reduce your options, and sin will feed upon itself further piling on perceptual distortions, which further hinder your progress.

Finally we come to the San Bernardino connection. I haven’t tried to visually find his neighborhood by looking at Google street view or anything. I haven’t heard from ‘Him” in a while. But I have a theory. I think he was a mad man and that’s why he saw people as controlling his life all the time. I wasn’t insane dreaming about his life, so I saw his world as a sane person would. But I don’t know what THEY had to put up with when I wasn’t there. As far as I know it is as Burt and Mal said it is, and Burt Lombard took over his body, but before doing so, he paid me a rare call. Capish?

Let's take the knowing the future one first. My "super-self" theory is an interesting mathematical extrapelation of Einstein's special theory of relativity but it won't wash. There is another way I talked about knowing the future vintage 1080's snail mail. And that is en-grams from the future? Some may say engrams have no physicality so how can they "travel" anywhere, especially through Time? What we see in the Mind is "abberations" of the brain. We associate the accumulation of knowledge with information stored in our brain cells, which pretty much "already have to exist". Well, let's look at that. How do these people gain "information" about their pre-incarnate lives. According to Mr. Richi "there is no physical contiguous brain to store information in so it can't happen". Well, what if we "read" engrams? You say "Isn't that the problem to begin with?" Actually no. Most people talk about "running" engrams, the same way you "run a computer program. But if you enter in DOS TYPE *.BAS you can "read" the actual program instructions to gain insight, perhaps even fix it or at least see what caused the problem if there is one. Hence "print outs" of this nature thus contain information that can be "read" and they travel to us from the past. They can also travel, I suggest, from the Future. Some are tempted to resort to the vinyl "print through" analogy like my copy of 'Helen Wheels". Well, not quite. But to say that no physicality travels through time- may be jumping the gun.

So how can hyperspace have dimensions? Hyperspace is beyond infinity, agreed? For instance if you take a piece of paper and draw a horizon line and then draw a perpendicular pair of railroad tracks going off to Infinity at the horizon- - well. Now suppose you draw a small x an inch or so above the horizon line and someone asks you "Where on the ground- - how far away does that x lie?" You can't answer that. It's beyond infinity. Here's another. You have a photograph lying on a table. It's two dimensional. Suppose you say to some entity in the photograph "find a point three inches up". "What point", they ask. "Any point", you insist. They say "We can't do that. We haven't a clue". And they don't. This is how it is with space in the psychic dimension (s). Suppose there is some principle that in order for something to be called material space it has to be enclosed in some kind of line entirely. A circle is such a line. Is a hyperbola such a line? No. A hyperbola can't enclose space. Now many may say with respect to circular trigonometry "I can understand that and its applications but hyperbolic trig is alien to me". Are their dimensions in hyper space? How well do you know your trig? (my apologies if that's one of Sarah Palin's kids) Are our souls made of some sort of "tachions" that only travel faster than light if set free, like a bird from a cage? Is not the equation for hyperbolic trig basically just a flip-flopped rendition of that for circular trig? (consult Wolframalpha.com) Do not all the six standard functions in trigonometry have the same functions and mathematical relations to each other as the twin functions in regular trigonometry do? "I suppose so". I rest my case. Hyper-space can indeed have "dimensions". Well, I took on some hard ones today but I think I did allright.

No comments: