GOD KNOWS WHEN BUT YOU'RE DOING IT AGAIN
- - "Hey, Neil Savedra?"
You know it's a good thing Bob Dylan isn't dead because if he were he'd be rising in his grave in protest over KFI using his song, "Lay Down Your Weary Tune" this morning on the Jesus Christ show. You know, I didn't even mean to turn on the radio this morning. I meant to hit the TV and tune in the "Today" show. But everything has its reason. Today on the Jesus Christ show, our Holy Host was talking about Satan hiding in the good things in life we all seek, such as eating cantalope and the Lysteria bacteria. He says "If Lysteria hid out in animal feces there would be no problem". Neil then went on to talk about establishing big bounderies. For instance, if sex is a sin then don't have interraction with women at all if you're unmattied and you'll never be tempted. That makes a lot of sense. He says "And if you are told you are never to enter the state of Kansas, then don't even travel to America because that way you'll insure that you will never be in Kansas. Then Neil says "The problem with most people is that they want to see how close to sin they can get and still not be in trouble". Then Neil went on to talk about false teachers in the Church with appealing doctrines, and they sell a lot of books, and garner a lot of followers, but they are wrong when they preach doctrines such as "Everybody is saved". And then he went on to say how Satan transforms himself into other things such as a slice of cantalope, or an angel of light. And how if Satan only existed at a Mega-death rock concert there would be no business. (Sirius B will love the endorsement) So what is "wrong" with this approach. This brings about the necessity for "critical thinking" on the viewer's part. This doessn't mean to walk around with a scowl on your face all the time like some Ebonezer Scrooge all the time. This means to exercise some sort of independant intelligent judgement on the hearer's part when he tunes in something like the Jesus Christ show. For instance - - suppose you believe in circumcising your children for health reasons? Suppose you believe you should not conduct business on the Sabbath. You don't discuss money or make any deal or sign any contract on the Sabbath because for you the Sabbath is a special day and should not be tainted by commercialization. Suppose you have to have a love of the Nation of Israel. Suppose you believe in a God who practices moral equity and rewards the good and punishes the evil, and as Dr. Levy says "We are born with impulses tword good and impulses tward evil". You are all saying "Marcus, surely nothing is WRONG with any of these beliefs, is there?" Well technically each and every one of them is condemned somewhere in the new testament. Here's one for you. Let's take this "Big Boundaries" principle to its logical extreme. Everybody wants to be "Safe" right? OK. How often are "false teachers" of the Shinto faith condemned by Christian pastors. How about false Hindu teachers, or for that matter false teachers in Islam? Almost never. OK. How about false teachers in Christianity? Oh. Suddenly a light bulb is going on. Were we to follow Neil's logic we would be a Shinto or a Hindu or a Moslem, because these are religions that are "safe" from false teachers. There is kind of a human axiom out there. If there is a guy out there who says "Everyone else in my profession is a charleton, but you can Trust me!" you know that he is the One guy you should Not trust. Nobody else is that paranoid. Think about it. Not all of us walk around with the dissernment of a five year old, but people like Neil Savedra assumes that we do. But where does Neil get his OWN doctrines from. Would you trust a religion that cannonized eleven, and I believe, twelve books (if you count Acts) that were admitted into the Church Cannon by a guy who was later condemned (and almost Universally) as a Heritec? Think about it. There is all that "Doctrine" in those twelve NT books, and it was a heritic who first gave thumbs up on them. I don't know. I'd think about it. That's where you get this whole "Satan is hiding out under the bushes" or whatever- - doctrine. In fact a major teaching of this heriec is that Satan rules the whole world except for Christians, and all of nature has become Evil. But you can escape this "Evil" if you put in with our good god. But some of you are thinking, "Well, Lysteria is a bad thing and maybe I'll just avoid cantalope to be safe". Well as I said last time I have never stopped eating cantalope and I'm not worried. The odds of getting violently ill three weeks from now is about as likely as Herman Kane being elected President next November. But OK lets assume the worst happens. Let me tell you a little story you've no doubt heard before. Suppose a guy goes to the doctor with symptums. Perhaps it's a little chest pain or pains in his stomach. There is one of two things that can happen. Either the doctor says it's nothing, or you could have a serious disease. If it turns out to be Nothing- - then all is well and good. Now you're down to fifty percent. If you have a disease the doctor diagnoses there is one of two choices that could occur. Either you will get better, or you will die. If the doctor comes up with a treatment and you get better all is well. If you Die then you have one of two choices. Either you go to Heaven or you go to Hell. If you go to Heaven all is well. And if you go to Hell, you'll be too busy shaking hands with old friends you won't be worried anyhow. In light of this lets do a couple more examples. Suppose some hypothetical person in the fall of 1993 has sex with a girl named Angie. And two months later he begins feeling kind of chronically "a little ill" all the time, and the symptons hang on for months. Blood tests years later confirmed this person did indeed have Hepatitus B. But he managed to beat it without once even going to the doctor. So much for Obama health care. Can we infer that this person got the Hepatitus B from the sex? It might just have easily occurred from a visit to the dentist. He's had root canals. Or there are those bed bugs where he would wake with these round bites all over his body. It could have been carried in that. I mean- - if he got it from the sex then how come the girl isn't sick? "Oh I didn't think of that?" Suppose the very worst scenario sin-wise happens. Once again you're having sex without a condom and it's fall of 1989. And it turns out that soon the woman becomes pregnent. If she's married you're not legally liable anyhow. Even Dennis Prager will tell you this. It's what's known in legal lingo as a "freebee". The baby may not be yours. The wonan is not known as the sort of person who kisses and tells anyhow, and you know she's the sort of person with a lot of secrets. Nobody is going to question nothing. Anything short of the baby coming out a space alien and you're safe the way I see it. No harm no fowl. On the other hand those who play songs from artists as though those artists somehow endoursed your show- - now that's another matter. "Lay Down your Weary Tune" is a beautiful song. Dylan says it's an old Scottish tune he picked up somewhere along the way. Let's talk about DNA a little. If it's true that Apes have 96% or our human DNA, then DNA isn't the dead giveaway you may think. I've heard that we have DNA in our systems that's identical to that of a fly. Just to get cosmic on you for a minute, we have talked about "Half Breeds". These are Detroit Romulans who are 50% Andromadan rather than the usual 25% alottment. The reason is that 25% is a more stable DNA. It's a case of evolution and the "survival of the fittest". The half breeds have more features that are dissernably not human, if you're getting a physical from your Romulan doctor.
GEEKS - TIME TO TAKE PART IN SOME "QUIZ"
Some of you Science geeks may want to "check me out" and come to certain deductive conclusions of your own. First of all did you know that at no time have I ever seen one of these people from the Other Side smoking a cigarette? And I myself have never smoked a cigarette on another planet or seen others smoking there. Also there is something about the planets Bela Tagis IV and also Bela Tagis V (before it blew up) - - there is some distinctive feature both planets have that has never been mentioned in any communacation dating back to 1985, but it's none the less a deducable truth. It's something scientists can infer, even though in our writings we have never stated it. Also, do you know how I personally label Stars and label Planets and how to know whether I'm referring to a Star or a planet? This works most of the time however last Saturday (yesterday) I violated my own principle. But in general it holds. And also talking about the "dog star" system, we violate it there, too. How do astronomers denote Stars and how do they denote planets and how can you generally tell? OK we have another "logical deduction" question. You know like Spock, "I have merely deduced- - that you are a Liar". OK here we go. We said that Romulans are secretive about their cloaking technology. However with one governmental subset of another governmental jourisdiction- - - we may deduce that the Romulans have shared their cloaking technology with at least one People. Even though we have never expressly state it, it can be logically deduced. Remember a few postings back when I talked about a certain planet "most probably being cloaked- so our telescopes don't see it". If you are up on all our postings should have no trouble answering this easy question. Oh, by the way the same is probably true for Alpha Centauri "x". Now we put the "x" in quotes. Why did I do that and why is it a small x and not a big x. Knowing algebra here helps. If you know almost any imperitive algorithmic computer program language you know the "x" would not be in quotes in a default setting in a program. I put it on quotes for another reason. Tell me what that reason is. So what am I referring to specifically saying Alpha Centauri "x" when the "x" isn't supposed to be in quotes in a computer program?
No comments:
Post a Comment